danbytext
Danby picture
ALP Logo
Google

Links

Newsletters Previous Headlines Press Releases Recent speeches
Published Articles    

Aust. national music academy: Once elite - Now on the Street

crest

Michael Danby
Federal Member for Melbourne Ports

24th November 2008

Michael's speech was reported in Melbourne's Herald Sun (to read, click here) and the Sydney Morning Herald (to read, click here). 

Mr DANBY (Melbourne Ports) (10.32 p.m.)-The Australian National Academy of Music is located in Bank Street, South Melbourne, in my electorate. It is part of the arts precinct in Southbank and South Melbourne that employs many people and brings such cultural vitality to the area I represent. Many of its staff and some of its students are my constituents. I respect the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts. I know he has had a difficult job grappling with the future of the Australian National Academy of Music, but I make no secret of the fact that I regret the minister's decision to end funding for the academy as of the end of this year. I have discussed this issue with the minister and with the director of the academy. It is still my view that it is in the interests of the academy's students and in the interests of the future of classical music performance in Australia for the academy to remain in existence and in its present premises. Achieving that objective is my aim.

richardt
  Richard Tognetti, Australia's premier violinist spoke out against the Academy's closure

The current proposal is that the academy's functions be transferred to a new body, the Australian Institute of Music Performance, located at the University of Melbourne. There are no physical premises ready at the university to receive the academy's students at the start of 2009. I understand that the university intends building a new performance facility at the conservatorium, but that will certainly not be ready next year, so the academy's current students will at best have to be in makeshift premises next year, to the detriment of their training. The minister has said that transitional arrangements will be made for ANAM students in 2009. I am sure he means this, but I still think that there is a risk that students who have already been accepted by the academy for 2009 and have planned their lives around that assumption may find themselves with no place to perform. As successful applicant for the ANAM 2009 Samuel Curkpatrick said in last weekend's Sunday Herald Sun:

anam
Students of the Australian National Academy of Music

"The audition process was gruelling. On top of 15 years of playing experience, and a bachelor degree with honours, it involved at least 50 practice hours, three rounds of national auditions , observed group rehearsal and interviews. Too bad there in now no alternative (post-graduate applications have closed)."

Some have indicated that they will go overseas. This would be a tragedy for Australia.

The second issue is that the function of a university is to grant degrees and to educate students to the level required to gain a degree. The Australian National Academy of Music is not an educational institution in that sense. Many of its students are already graduates in music. Its function is not to grant degrees; it is to train elite musical performers and to bring them to a level at which they can perform with the best musicians in the world. Moving them to Melbourne university, an institution with different objectives, and placing them in an undergraduate environment, with all its competing pressures and distractions, will also be to their detriment. The minister has said that ANAM students will be able to undertake non-degree based performance training at the university. That may be the intention, but I am not persuaded that this will be an adequate substitute for the training they are currently getting at the dedicated facilities at the academy in South Melbourne.

townhall
The Performance Centre of the Australian National Academy of Music at the South Melbourne Town Hall

Since the minister announced his decision, I have seen the academy's development strategy of December 2006 and the report on the academy's future by Jonathan Mills. Both these reports recommended that the academy be retained as an independent institution and that its funding be increased to enable it to meet its responsibilities more effectively. Mr Mills recommended that the academy's funding be increased from its current $2.5 million a year to about $6.5 million or $7 million. I note that we spend $15 million a year training elite sports men and women at the Australian Institute of Sport. Achieving excellence in the arts is every bit as important-and many would say it is more important-as achieving excellence in sport.

I hope the minister will take note of the concerns expressed by the students and staff of the academy and of the respected members of the arts community-concerns that I, as the academy's local member, have given voice to tonight-and reconsider his decision. I stand ready to work with the minister for the benefit of the ANAM staff and, most importantly, its current and prospective students. We cannot say to our greatest future classical music talent: you were once elite and now you are on the street.

On the 28th of November Minister Garrett announced that ANAM would keep its name and discussions with the faculty and students regarding their concerns have occured and they would be receiving further funding of $500,000. Click here to read the announcement.

030221di-010_small
Member for Melbourne Ports Mr Michael Danby MP

# reads: 1530

Print
Printable version

Home | About | Electors | Media | Information | Local | Environment | Health | Privacy

Web Site Design by Dror Poleg www.drorism.com
© Content Copyright 2010 Michael Danby
Powered by webtrack logo

Readers feedback


don't worry Shane.More info here than in the Spencer St Soviet.I think they are motivated by bigotry in blocking any mention of Danby.

Posted by brother bill on 2008-12-05 13:52:45 GMT


Dear Michael, The posting on your website of 3 December contains a number of comments which deserve clarification. ANAM has 8.7 fulltime equivalent administrative staff, not 12 as stated by your correspondent. In 2008 the Academy presented over 170 public performances and events to over 12,000 members of the community - more than the total number of performances presented by the Melbourne Symphony Orchestra - most of which were free. This represents one part only of its extensive body of work, and it alone represents a considerable achievement for such a small administrative group. The Peter Grant report of 2006 was commissioned by the Commonwealth Government. To dismiss this independent report because it came to the conclusion that ANAM was working well and, if anything, required significant increased funding to expand its programs, says more about your correspondent than it does about the Academy or the report. The only losses which the Academy has ever registered have been the result of the phasing of grant payments, and consequently covered in adjacent years. Thank you for your on-going support of the Academy and its valuable work. Nick Bailey Acting General Manager Australian National Academy of Music

Posted on 2008-12-05 01:52:16 GMT


There was a report prepared in mid 2006, which examined the financial viability and the effectiveness of the ANAM program. Fundamentally with 40 students at that time and 12 administrative staff(faculty staff not included)the organisation was top heavy with administrators. The organisation still has 12 administrative staff albeit with 55 students. What other organisation has public funding for such excessive administrative 'support'? The minister's decision was based on a sound report that was wilfully ignored by the previous government. The December 2006 report to which you refer was prepared by ANAM supporters and as such cannot be regarded as independent advice. Those protesting about the closure of the academy clearly do not know of the wanton waste of public funds on administration at ANAM, compounded by such poor management of the funding that ANAM ended up $300,000 in debt! I suggest that those who are protesting about the closure of ANAM read the article in the 'Australian' at http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,,24582994-16947,00.html. The account there is vastly more informative than anything originating in Melbourne.

Posted on 2008-12-03 11:04:54 GMT


Why has the Age not mentioned you or the delegation who saw Garret?

Posted by Danke Shane on 2008-11-29 08:49:43 GMT


Good on you, Michael. This is an appalling decision. I have been following it closely. It is an example of "penny wise and pound foolish", as they used to say when I was a child. Heather

Posted by heather.abramson@bigpond.com on 2008-11-26 09:38:42 GMT


Michael Yet again you are not averse to standing up & voicing an opinion that reflects that of many who the Federal Minister (incorrectly) believes he is championing by this ill conceived and party political decision. May your voice of reason, sense & sensibility be heard above the rabble of your Labor Party colleagues & may your electorate & the wider community become well aware of the passionate stance you take on a broad range of issues that doesn't just reflect the (already tired & in many cases now ill-conceived) party-line. Continued good luck & success in all your future endeavours & may your next 10 years as the member for Melbourne Ports only prove to be more successful & personally satisfying than your first decade as a loyal & unrelenting champion of your electorate & an articulate spokesman on behalf of all those causes for which you are never afraid to speak out on.

Posted by David of Preston on 2008-11-26 03:27:30 GMT


I see that once again you are fearlessly standing up for what is right. Keep up the good work

Posted by Anon on 2008-11-26 02:32:41 GMT